For some, comparing products and services may be somewhat unfair, since each product has its special characteristic, with features that can make the final result of the tests varying end, but not enough to make the product worse than another. However, we believe that comparisons are also important to show qualities and defects of different products, showing their qualities and defects.
In this special case, we can show that a comparative two products as robust in terms of hardware can be so different in their performance. The staff of My Nokia Blog decided to do the comparison between the Nokia N8 (Symbian ^ 3, 680 MHz version and Anna) with Motorola Atrix (with Tegra and Android 2.2 2 1 GHz dual core). For that alone, the comparison could be considered unjust, but the highlight is the performance of the operating systems of devices.
From the perspective of the comparison has been posted on Nokia's own bolg, the comparison is biased. To view the images in the gallery of Atrix showed a lag, while the N8 was a more natural view, and a smoother rotation of images. Moreover, a simple sensitivity test screen and accelerometer may not be determinant to say that a machine is better than another.
For a fairer comparison would require a more thorough test, the two devices with performance in games, multimedia applications, video, boot time the two devices, response time of opening of similar applications, among others. Anyway, here's the video comparison.
Check The Comparison Here:
